http://mta-sts.mail.victoriasclub.co.uk/nu-tienda-azithromycin-100mg.php Heroine is a word of the feminine gender, so it is applicable to your mother and the meaning of the word is applicable, so I would not strongly object to using this option.
However, hero is probably preferable here. It is worth note that since mom adequately signifies gender, there is no need to signify her gender twice.
Noah Webster wrote the following on page 31 of A Philosophical and Practical Grammar of the English Language , which was published over two centuries ago in He did not revise this provision in a later edition of this work, retitled to An Improved Grammar of the English Language , which was written after his American Dictionary of the English Language An American Dictionary of the English Language included words like soldieress although he marked that as unused , and warrioress , so the mere existence of feminine alternatives was not enough to sway his opinion.
As such, we can presume that a sentence such as the one you grant would have been acceptable since the early 19th century, meaning that there are no grounds for objecting to this, even on a traditionalist basis. As a matter of fact, popular usage suggests that there is not any significant usage of the heroine variation :.
This also seems relatively rare online. Personally, I can only see four up to four pages of results from Google, and that is only after I enable the option to see possible repeat results when you reach the last page. There are also some reasonably contemporary considerations, such as the use of of a homophone, heroin , which is the name to a drug, causing potential albeit unlikely confusion in actual speech: It could be taken as metonomy for addiction, rather than heroism.
Moreover, the fact that the gender neutrality movement often has a tendency to try to completely emasculate words of the masculine gender when there is no neuter alternative, in an attempt to correct societal preconceptions regarding gender roles, as is the case in the "Are Heroes Always Men? Drucker and Robert S. Current Dictionaries include both male and gender neutral definitions for hero. In Webster's Third New International Dictionary the first definition is gender-neutral, the second male, the third male, and the fourth gender-neutral.
The term hero is not exclusively used for males, but heroine is just used for females. As noted above, recent guidelines for nonsexist language stress the elimination of needless gender terms. Hero should be a gender-neutral word that is used for both men and women.
If hero continues to be the term for males and heroine for women, gender stereotypes will continue. In isolation, I might not personally consider these contemporary factors so especially convincing of the need to eschew heroine in and of themselves. However, since there is no need to do otherwise here, because mom already signifies femininity, they do add to the persuasiveness of choosing hero in its stead.
English usually uses the male form of titles when referring to general roles, or mixed gender groups of a role.
In this context, I'd say "hero" is being used to refer to a general role, so it's unnecessary to specify that the "hero" in question is female. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. It is perfectly OK to call your mother your hero. It's also perfectly OK to call her your heroine. The feminine form of some words has fallen out of style -- a woman pilot would never now be called an aviatrix -- she is an aviator.
Malayalam has Mohanlal at the top with over 2 crores followed by Mammootty at 1. Others like Dulquer and Fahadh are in the lakhs bracket and they sign more projects a year as compared to Nivin. Not all of these salaries appear on paper, especially after demonetisation, the sources are quick to add. Property deals or other such lucrative deals are also done. Profit sharing, although new, is catching up, too.
Mainstream films which are hero-centric are sold on the name of the male actor. It is the male actor who brings people to the theatres and ensures big openings for the film although a popular heroine adds to the excitement around it. Movie industries have very few female producers, directors, script writers, and technicians. Therefore, though almost every film has a heroine in it, the stories that are told are about men.
This is why in the Telugu industry, for instance, the pay disparity is so wide.
The top female stars, Nayanthara and Anushka Shetty, make over 1. In the second rung are Samantha, Kajal Aggarwal, and Rakul who make over 1 crore.
In Tamil too the differences are stark. Top heroines command a salary between Rs 1 and 1. Many female stars from Malayalam and Telugu are ready to act in Tamil movies for anything between Rs 50 lakhs.
The money is much better compared to what they make in their industry. Malayalam and Kannada women actors get much lower pay, with only Manju Warrier demanding Rs 50 lakh. A source says that Ramya Divya Spandana , who is now a Congress MP, used to earn 50 lakhs per film but that none of the other female actors have managed to hit the mark. The closest was Radhika Pundit at 36 lakhs but she quit films after marrying Yash.
The highest paid Kannada woman actor now is Rachita Ram who gets lakhs. Suriya and Karthi, for example, work mainly with people in their family or close circles, so their salaries contain perks and privileges. Though women actors make much lesser than their male counterparts, they typically do more films a year as their time commitment to a project tends to be lesser. This is because in a hero-centric film, the women actors don't have as much to do as the men.
Movies with women as the central protagonist tend to be of much lower budgets because producers expect them to earn much lesser money than what hero-centric films make. These films are still considered to be 'experimental'.