devportalbackend.niftygateway.com Other psychological phenomena are less readily replicated eg.
No doubt a key factor is whether the replication occurs within the same lab or across different labs. Nonetheless, as the psychologist Arina Bones humorously remarked , since so few psychology papers state hypotheses that are later disproved, scientific hypothesising in psychology may be the most reliable form of precognition. Last year, Harold Pashler and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers noted that psychology is becoming " … the public face for the replicability problems of science in the early 21st century, [and] psychological science has the opportunity to rise to the occasion and provide leadership in finding better ways to overcome bias and error in science generally.
Although some individuals are culpable, psychology's problems are largely systemic. We cannot rectify every issue immediately, but a great start would be to value replication and negative findings by offering researchers the space to publish such findings — not in a dedicated journal for unloved findings but at the heart of mainstream psychology journals.
Returning user. Familien Dynamik: Systemische Praxis und. In the case of touch, Goldreich and Kanics have found that in early blind subjects there was evidence for enhanced tactile discrimination in a gratings orientation task. Stigmatising language Suicide is a considerable public health issue with ripple effects throughout the community. Steps can be, and are being, taken to make malpractice even more difficult; but the subdiscipline does not deserve the harm to its reputation that may be provoked by the careless implication of unique deficiencies. Psychiatric medication does have its uses, but only if accompanied by clear messages about its limitations — it cannot heal the trauma and abuse that, as a growing amount of research indicates, plays a causal role across all.
With the launch of BMC Psychology on Wednesday, our journal policy is to offer a dedicated open access forum for psychologists to publish work deemed by peer reviewers " … to be a coherent and sound addition to scientific knowledge and to put less emphasis on interest levels. This remit unquestionably includes null results and replications and the more central role they must play within the discipline.
We cannot avoid the conclusion that psychologists, editors and reviewers have conspired to deny the rightful place of negative results and the importance of replication — psychology's dirty little secrets. We must change. Peer review and scientific publishing Controversies blogposts. Open access. Is it dangerous? From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation Thomas J.
The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space K. Recent issues. Tools Submit an Article Browse free sample issue Get content alerts.
This is a preview of the February issue of The Psychologist, the monthly publication of the British Psychological Society. To download the. February , Vol 44, No. 2. Print version: page characteristics that make some psychologists more effective. Why are some psychologists better at.
Subscribe to this journal. Email or Customer ID. Forgot password?
Advanced Search Search Help. Up to Journal.
Online First. View articles not assigned to an issue. Volume 68 February - August Volume 67 February - December Volume 66 February - December Volume 65 February - December Volume 64 February - December Volume 63 February - December Volume 62 February - December Volume 61 February - December Volume 60 February - December Volume 59 February - December Volume 58 February - December Dykstra and Allan Hugh Cole Jr. Volume 57 September - January Volume 56 September - July Volume 55 September - July Volume 54 September - July Volume 53 September - July Volume 52 November - July Volume 51 September - July Volume 50 September - July Volume 49 September - July Volume 48 September - July Volume 47 September - July